Last week I gave myself a fright, when browsing the Trauma Patent application by BioPorto. The awful words “final rejection” were hanging in the air, until Corporate Lawyer Gry eased my troubled mind…

In her mail she indicated that BioPorto was prepairing a response to USPTO…

Well , she was very much to the point on july 10th the response – with proposed amendments  was filed. These are the new claims:

Claims Trauma Patent july 2012

The amendments : Basically BioPorto mentions that obviousness argument and the double patenting is irrelevant – because BioPorto filed their application first and because the Trauma patent is excluding kidney injury.

Remarks on the amended claims Trauama Patent 2012

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.